[Tagging] Playground equipment

Marc Gemis marc.gemis at gmail.com
Mon Jul 20 10:14:47 UTC 2015

I was waiting for some more reactions, but for now playground=structure
seems the best value for me.
And I leave the more detailed mapping of the individual parts to someone
else for now, someone with better pictures, aerial images or GPS waypoints.
I'll add the material=wood

Is it OK to add this with a picture to the wikipage ?


On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Tom Pfeifer <t.pfeifer at computer.org>

> John Willis wrote on 2015-07-20 00:35:
>> Because it is under the playground tag, just "structure" should be fine.
>> Structure might be a good value for a large piece, if the other pieces
> > (bridges, slides, climbing nets, etc) are large enough to be mappable
> > (like a very large installation at a park).
> Yes playground=structure is good, most of the existing values do not have
> the term 'play' in the key.
> The micromapper can certainly put playground=structure on the whole thing
> as an area, and add nodes for the specific elements (slides etc).
> Andy Mabbett wrote on 2015-07-20 00:44:> On 19 July 2015 at 15:37,
> > I would just tag as "playground=climbingframe" with "material=wood".
> I tend to disagree here since climbingframe is one of the specific
> elements.
> Material is fine, of course.
> tom
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150720/02633a6a/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list