[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:waste_collection

David Bannon dbannon at internode.on.net
Mon Mar 2 07:07:45 UTC 2015


I agree with Jan in that a small set of (universally acceptable) values
would make the proposal more attractive. Can we identify a few that can
be bundled in ?

Ones that won't annoy those who lurk silently until voting time ?

David

On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 06:22 +0000, Jan van Bekkum wrote:
> Warin,
> 
> Don't you van a few possible values that create little controversion
> to be included in the proposal. The ones that cause more discussion
> can be added later. In this way you have a complete proposal without
> losing the main key because of disagreement about proposed values.
> 
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:08 AM Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
>         On 28/02/2015 8:57 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>         
>         > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Warin
>         > <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
>         >         I'm going to move this to voting shortly .. do
>         >         remember the vote is on the key ... not values. Thus
>         >         the vote is on "waste_collection=", not recycling,
>         >         'reverse fees'  :-) , etc etc. 
>         > 
>         > 
>         > -5
>         > 
>         > 
>         > I disagree: the vote is on the proposal, not just "the key".
>         > The wiki process works well when the entire proposal can be
>         > improved, and a good pattern of tagging set from the start.
>         
>         
>         We'll have to agree to disagree then. 
>         
>         
>         ------------------------------------
>         As a concept OSM maps what is seen on the ground.
>          The present waste type things are taged as to the thing
>         collected .. not what is seen on  the ground... 
>         
>         Should not the tag there be primarily on that thing on the
>         ground?
>         
>         Certainly for the solid wastes ... 
>         capacity - would indicate the size ... probably in litres as
>         that looks to be the way the things are specified?
>         receptical - wheelie bin, skip bin .. and others ..
>         names/descriptions to be found ... ?
>         
>         and then lastly what goes in them? 
>         
>         Just a though ... any comments ...? 
>         I know that the person looking to dispose of a certain thing
>         will search for that .. but once found they'd like not only
>         the location but the size and description would be handy? 
>         
>         
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         Tagging mailing list
>         Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging





More information about the Tagging mailing list