[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:waste_collection
David Bannon
dbannon at internode.on.net
Mon Mar 2 07:07:45 UTC 2015
I agree with Jan in that a small set of (universally acceptable) values
would make the proposal more attractive. Can we identify a few that can
be bundled in ?
Ones that won't annoy those who lurk silently until voting time ?
David
On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 06:22 +0000, Jan van Bekkum wrote:
> Warin,
>
> Don't you van a few possible values that create little controversion
> to be included in the proposal. The ones that cause more discussion
> can be added later. In this way you have a complete proposal without
> losing the main key because of disagreement about proposed values.
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:08 AM Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 28/02/2015 8:57 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Warin
> > <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm going to move this to voting shortly .. do
> > remember the vote is on the key ... not values. Thus
> > the vote is on "waste_collection=", not recycling,
> > 'reverse fees' :-) , etc etc.
> >
> >
> > -5
> >
> >
> > I disagree: the vote is on the proposal, not just "the key".
> > The wiki process works well when the entire proposal can be
> > improved, and a good pattern of tagging set from the start.
>
>
> We'll have to agree to disagree then.
>
>
> ------------------------------------
> As a concept OSM maps what is seen on the ground.
> The present waste type things are taged as to the thing
> collected .. not what is seen on the ground...
>
> Should not the tag there be primarily on that thing on the
> ground?
>
> Certainly for the solid wastes ...
> capacity - would indicate the size ... probably in litres as
> that looks to be the way the things are specified?
> receptical - wheelie bin, skip bin .. and others ..
> names/descriptions to be found ... ?
>
> and then lastly what goes in them?
>
> Just a though ... any comments ...?
> I know that the person looking to dispose of a certain thing
> will search for that .. but once found they'd like not only
> the location but the size and description would be handy?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
More information about the Tagging
mailing list