[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:waste_collection

[Jan van Bekkum]

Warin,

Don't you van a few possible values that create little controversion to be
included in the proposal. The ones that cause more discussion can be added
later. In this way you have a complete proposal without losing the main key
because of disagreement about proposed values.

On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:08 AM Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 28/02/2015 8:57 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>
>  On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  I'm going to move this to voting shortly .. do remember the vote is on
>> the key ... not values. Thus the vote is on "waste_collection=", not
>> recycling, 'reverse fees'  :-) , etc etc.
>>
>
>  -5
>
>  I disagree: the vote is on the proposal, not just "the key".
> The wiki process works well when the entire proposal can be improved, and
> a good pattern of tagging set from the start.
>
>
> We'll have to agree to disagree then.
>
>
> ------------------------------------
> As a concept OSM maps what is seen on the ground.
>  The present waste type things are taged as to the thing collected .. not
> what is seen on  the ground...
>
> Should not the tag there be primarily on that thing on the ground?
>
> Certainly for the solid wastes ...
> capacity - would indicate the size ... probably in litres as that looks to
> be the way the things are specified?
> receptical - wheelie bin, skip bin .. and others .. names/descriptions to
> be found ... ?
>
> and then lastly what goes in them?
>
> Just a though ... any comments ...?
> I know that the person looking to dispose of a certain thing will search
> for that .. but once found they'd like not only the location but the size
> and description would be handy?
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150302/b6398915/attachment.html>