[Tagging] Bus route relations. Forward/backward tag

Jo winfixit at gmail.com
Wed Mar 4 14:13:00 UTC 2015


Can you send links to the route relations? (Ctrl-Shft-h of Ctrl-Shift-i in
JOSM, then copy/paste the url).

That rendering with all the red lines is not the best way to represent PT.


Jo

2015-03-04 12:55 GMT+01:00 Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org>:

> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:58 AM, √Čric Gillet <gill3t.3ric+osm at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> 2015-02-16 13:03 GMT+01:00 fly <lowflight66 at googlemail.com>:
>>
>>> There are still cases where forward/backward are useful with P2-routes.
>>> E.g. a route with a loop and some members used twice but different
>>> directions.
>>>
>>
>> Shouldn't one just duplicate the stop_positions in the relation, and add
>> ways twice in order, without roles ?
>>
>> Also, as Jo said, the public transport v2 scheme is cleaner as each
>> variant of the route have its own relation, making loops in routes a rare
>> case.
>>
>
> You say that, but take a look at routes 108, 222CC, 222CW, 306, and TDT in
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/36.1501/-95.9415&layers=T .  This is
> a problem, a lot of transit systems have equally bizarre routes,
> particularly when systems are underdeveloped and overstretched like this
> one.  Would be nice if we had a tagging scheme that didn't think of routes
> as purely linear, or tools that could handle linear objects rationally.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150304/f67b38ca/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list