[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Reception Desk

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Sat Mar 14 22:08:37 UTC 2015

On 15/03/2015 4:50 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Andreas Goss <andig88 at t-online.de 
> <mailto:andig88 at t-online.de>> wrote:
>         Either use a site relation
>     Then why isn't this in the proposal?

I never envisaged a reception desk that would be off the site. Or place 
in such a way that it could not be seen to be part of a site.

What is the ratio of having to use a 'site relation' occuring to the 
simple case ? Less than 10%.. ?

I'll add a link to site relation ... there are other links that could be 
added too.. like urls, phone numbers, opening hours, checked etc etc .. 
the possibilities of things that could be used are large. I've only 
included those that I thought to be common, not rare.

> I think the negative votes followed from a poorly formatted and 
> confusing proposal.

Thanks for the negativity. Very helpfull.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150315/c082dde4/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list