[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power_supply:schedule
61sundowner at gmail.com
Sun Mar 15 23:14:13 UTC 2015
On 16/03/2015 9:41 AM, David Bannon wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 11:14 +0100, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
>> Where in the rules is the only persons who have participated previously
>> allowed to vote?
> It most certainly does not say that. On the other hand, sitting back and
> only being involved to vote 'no' is -
> 1. Bad manners. And any community has many unwritten manners rules.
> 2. Unproductive. Lot of well meaning effort goes into a proposal, where
> is the pleasure in killing it, apparently just for the sake of killing
> it ?
There is a lot more benefit in improving a tag. Please use the comments/draft time to do that.
> I would oppose firm rules like Jorg mentioned but, like any community,
> we need to indicate clearly just what bad manners are ! Perhaps a short
> para on good manners on the voting page ?
"Best Practice"? And it needs to be for the draft/comments section. With an expansion on the voting section?
More information about the Tagging