[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power_supply:schedule

Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com
Fri Mar 20 16:29:46 UTC 2015


The set voting period is over. The proposal collected 7 approval votes, and
2 oppose votes (one without comment). I have extended the voting period for
another week.

Regards,

Jan

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 12:15 AM Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 16/03/2015 9:41 AM, David Bannon wrote:
> > On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 11:14 +0100, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> >
> >> Where in the rules is the only persons who have participated previously
> >> allowed to vote?
> > It most certainly does not say that. On the other hand, sitting back and
> > only being involved to vote 'no' is -
> >
> > 1. Bad manners. And any community has many unwritten manners rules.
> >
> > 2. Unproductive. Lot of well meaning effort goes into a proposal, where
> > is the pleasure in killing it, apparently just for the sake of killing
> > it ?
>
> There is a lot more benefit in improving a tag. Please use the
> comments/draft time to do that.
>
> >
> > I would oppose firm rules like Jorg mentioned but, like any community,
> > we need to indicate clearly just what bad manners are ! Perhaps a short
> > para on good manners on the voting page ?
>
> "Best Practice"? And it needs to be for the draft/comments section. With
> an expansion on the voting section?
>
> >
> > David
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150320/652df817/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list