[Tagging] Accepted or rejected?

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at gmail.com
Tue Mar 17 18:55:07 UTC 2015


+1

2015-03-17 15:04 GMT+01:00 Kotya Karapetyan <kotya.lists at gmail.com>:

> Dear all,
>
> I think we deviated from the original question quite a bit. The point was
> that the current number of votes proposed in the wiki for accepted/rejected
> decision was self-contradicting. Even if there may be different opinions on
> that, the very discussion shows that the situation is not clear.
>
> I propose to clarify it by changing the recommended number of votes in
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features#Approved_or_rejected
> from "...*8 unanimous approval votes* *or **15 total votes with a
> majority approval...*"
> to "*...8 or more **unanimous approval votes or 10 or more total votes
> with more than 74 % approval...**".*
> This will not change anything in terms of the ongoing discussion of *how* the
> approval influences other things. So the discussion can continue. But we'd
> introduce some mathematical logic in the process.
>
> I don't think there is a procedure to vote on such proposals, so please
> just give it +1 here if you agree. We change it when we have 8+ "plus ones"
> if there are no significant objections to *this* change. Once again,
> please note: we are not discussing the consequences of approval/rejection,
> we just change the rule of thumb recommendation to a mathematically more
> sound one.
>
> Cheers,
> Kotya
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> inscription
>>>
>>> note (not rendered .. for use by mappers to make notes to other mappers
>>> ? thus not required to be rendered?)
>>
>>
>> Visible in a popup in geschichtskarten for historical items.
>>
>> But you were talking about all renderers I thought. Now you seem happy
>> that there is 1 renderer showing the feature/data ?
>> I'm still convinced that features that people want to map will be mapped,
>> regardless of the state of the tagging proposal.
>>
>>
>> m.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150317/2d2c9d98/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list