[Tagging] Historic tower
lowflight66 at googlemail.com
Tue Mar 24 10:58:33 UTC 2015
start_date is more universal like using it for shops and amenities and
not only for buildings is possible.
You can use start_date with construction=*, too, it only vanishes after
the construction is finished.
Have no problem with construction:start_date=* but please use
comprehensive and clear tags.
Why not invent some more tags for constructions like buildings=* if useful.
Am 23.03.2015 um 23:15 schrieb Warin:
> start_date ? start of planning?, construction? occupation?
> completion of planning? construction? occupation?
> built_data ... is fairly simple. I like simple and plain. It would need
> more words for structures that have several 'additions',
> 'refurbishments', etc .. but the meaning is more apparent than
> start_date and completion_date.
> On 24/03/2015 8:43 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
>> Wouldn't it make much more sense to use start_date for the starting
>> date, and completion_date for the completion date?
More information about the Tagging