[Tagging] Tagging established, unofficial and wild campings

Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com
Wed Mar 25 06:45:15 UTC 2015


So far I have created different nodes (or areas if known) for different
amenities and linked them by means of a site relation. The ones I typically
added to the camp_sites I mapped are amenity=restaurant, amenity=bar and
amenity=shower. I believe this is the correct way to do it as it allows for
different attributes for different amenities. For example if the restaurant
has other opening hours than the bar you can map that.

The site relation tells that the amenities all belong to the camp_site.
However, I do not know how this is rendered in practice.


Met vriendelijke groet/with kind regards,

*Jan van Bekkum*
www.DeEinderVoorbij.nl

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:23 PM, David Bannon <dbannon at internode.on.net>
wrote:

> On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 09:42 -0700, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:11 PM, David Bannon wrote
> >
> >         Are we better saying -
> >           tourism=camp_site
> >           toilets=yes
> >           sanitary_dump_station=yes
> >           amenity=showers
> >           fee=yes
> >
> > Yes.
> > Because camp sites will defy categorization.
>
> No, sorry, I don't think that works either ! Looking at a typical
> commercial book that describes camp sites, you expect to see a list,
> maybe a long one, things like toilets, water, showers, laundary, BBQ,
> fire place and so one. Many of these are already in amenity=*. But its
> silly to do on one node or area -
>
> tourism=camp_site
> name=Happy Campers Rest
> amenity=bbq
> amenity=fireplace
> amenity=bench
> amenity=waste_disposal
>
> So, I'd need to map each as an individual node. A search of the data
> will not necessarily associate the BBQ with Happy Campers Rest Caravan
> Park. Thats just as silly.
>
> Someone making a map wants to see one object with these attributes so
> they can decide what to render and how to render it.
>
>
> tourism=camp_site:amenity=bbq;fireplace;drinking_water;waste_disposal;toilets;showers;bench
> name=Happy Camper Rest
>
> Ugly but works in terms of associating the data in a meaningful way.
>
> I think we still need categories in some form so that renders have a
> hint of what they should do.
>
> David
> >
> >
> > But definitely add "official" there, or a least "operator".  I want to
> > know in advance if the tent symbol on the map represents a place
> > I can comfortably stay without getting woken up at 5am by a farmer
> > with a shotgun *
> >
> >
> >            -Bryce
> >
> >
> > * Been there, done that.
> >
> >
> > ** Also add "stay_limit=7 nights", "internet_access=wlan",
> > "camp_host=no", "network=", "campfire_permitted=season",
> > "ranger_programs", "website".
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150325/a3170a95/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list