[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power_supply:schedule
Jan van Bekkum
jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com
Thu Mar 26 18:04:46 UTC 2015
The voting period is over. The proposal collected 10 approvals and 2
rejects. Therefore I moved it to state approved:
Met vriendelijke groet/with kind regards,
*Jan van Bekkum*
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Jan van Bekkum <jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com>
> The set voting period is over. The proposal collected 7 approval votes,
> and 2 oppose votes (one without comment). I have extended the voting period
> for another week.
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 12:15 AM Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 16/03/2015 9:41 AM, David Bannon wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 11:14 +0100, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
>> >> Where in the rules is the only persons who have participated previously
>> >> allowed to vote?
>> > It most certainly does not say that. On the other hand, sitting back and
>> > only being involved to vote 'no' is -
>> > 1. Bad manners. And any community has many unwritten manners rules.
>> > 2. Unproductive. Lot of well meaning effort goes into a proposal, where
>> > is the pleasure in killing it, apparently just for the sake of killing
>> > it ?
>> There is a lot more benefit in improving a tag. Please use the
>> comments/draft time to do that.
>> > I would oppose firm rules like Jorg mentioned but, like any community,
>> > we need to indicate clearly just what bad manners are ! Perhaps a short
>> > para on good manners on the voting page ?
>> "Best Practice"? And it needs to be for the draft/comments section. With
>> an expansion on the voting section?
>> > David
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging