[Tagging] Tagging method of amenities at camp_sites

Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com
Fri Mar 27 11:37:01 UTC 2015


So if you don't know the real shape of the polygon it would be best to
create a placeholder polygon (like a circle - it will be clear that it is a
placeholder) and put all amenities inside it until the real shape is known.

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:33 AM Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> wrote:

> Overpass understands this. When I look for all toilets in the "Zoo
> Antwerpen" with [1], I only find toilets in that Zoo
>
> regards
>
> m
>
> [1] http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/8qL
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>> OK, I did not know that !  Is this "is-in-polygon" test something that
>>> is already being done ?  Examples ?
>>>
>>
>> Nominatim that adds the address of the building to the POI is an example
>> of a similar test / algorithm.
>> Sorry, don't know any other examples. But it just makes sense that you do
>> not have to define inclusion of something when you can determine that from
>> it's position.
>>
>> I also only know 1 website that supports the site relation, the
>> geschichtskarte for historical items
>>
>> regards
>>
>> m
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150327/0e1617f5/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list