[Tagging] Tagging method of amenities at camp_sites

Bryce Nesbitt bryce2 at obviously.com
Sat Mar 28 00:32:35 UTC 2015

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:

>  OR .. you could place each node of the separate features close together
> with a fixme tag on them ...
> This way you don't need two systems for tagging the same thing. And it
> makes it easier for a mapper to move them to the correct location when they
> are found. And it conveys the information and being spacialy close they
> indicate that the loctions are not absolutely correct. ANd the renders
> don't need to recognise two different systems for the same thing.

The advantage of the single node approach is you can make a list of camp
sites and their amenities really easily,
and you can click once on a campsite tag, and understand what's there.

Look at camp and caravan sites in New Zealand for examples of full on
"ammenity" style tagging.

I think piling a bunch of nodes in the wrong place is not particularly kind
to the next mapper, or the reader.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150327/30c0d7c6/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list