[Tagging] Tagging method of amenities at camp_sites

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Sat Mar 28 12:49:07 UTC 2015

> Am 27.03.2015 um 17:21 schrieb Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2 at obviously.com>:
> Site relations are clearly the best solution when micro-mapping.

site relations are only adding value when you want to connect objects that are not already spatially connected, or when you want to use fancy roles (eg this parking, not on the site itself, is for the customers of this site, or this is the ticket office for this site)


>  In simple cases a few attributes on a node does just fine, gets the job done,
> and causes no problems.

+1, although I'd normally prefer any approximation of an area to a (dimensionless) node

> A huge downside of #4 is for armchair mapping.  I may have access to a website for a caravan_site, and know that if offers showers,
> laundry and a dump station.  But I have no idea where on the site they are.  All I can really do is tag those amenities as attributes.

yes, if you don't know what you are mapping the result will hardly be good 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150328/c78c4326/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list