[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power_supply:schedule

Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com
Sat Mar 28 21:35:55 UTC 2015


I did that, but somebody reversed it without telling me. I now put it in
the tourism section.

On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 10:14 PM Michał Brzozowski <www.haxor at gmail.com>
wrote:

> You have to edit the Map Features template.
>
> Michał
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Jan van Bekkum <jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I can't find how I get this in Map_Features. Can anybody help?
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:04 PM Jan van Bekkum <jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> The voting period is over. The proposal collected 10 approvals and 2
> >> rejects. Therefore I moved it to state approved:
> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Power_supply:schedule
> >>
> >> Met vriendelijke groet/with kind regards,
> >>
> >> Jan van Bekkum
> >> www.DeEinderVoorbij.nl
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Jan van Bekkum <
> jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The set voting period is over. The proposal collected 7 approval votes,
> >>> and 2 oppose votes (one without comment). I have extended the voting
> period
> >>> for another week.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Jan
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 12:15 AM Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 16/03/2015 9:41 AM, David Bannon wrote:
> >>>> > On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 11:14 +0100, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> >> Where in the rules is the only persons who have participated
> >>>> >> previously
> >>>> >> allowed to vote?
> >>>> > It most certainly does not say that. On the other hand, sitting back
> >>>> > and
> >>>> > only being involved to vote 'no' is -
> >>>> >
> >>>> > 1. Bad manners. And any community has many unwritten manners rules.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > 2. Unproductive. Lot of well meaning effort goes into a proposal,
> >>>> > where
> >>>> > is the pleasure in killing it, apparently just for the sake of
> killing
> >>>> > it ?
> >>>>
> >>>> There is a lot more benefit in improving a tag. Please use the
> >>>> comments/draft time to do that.
> >>>>
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I would oppose firm rules like Jorg mentioned but, like any
> community,
> >>>> > we need to indicate clearly just what bad manners are ! Perhaps a
> >>>> > short
> >>>> > para on good manners on the voting page ?
> >>>>
> >>>> "Best Practice"? And it needs to be for the draft/comments section.
> With
> >>>> an expansion on the voting section?
> >>>>
> >>>> >
> >>>> > David
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Tagging mailing list
> >>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150328/b55bb366/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list