[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power_supply:schedule

Ole Nielsen on-osm at xs4all.nl
Sun Mar 29 11:09:31 UTC 2015


I'm the one who reverted your edit to 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Map_Features:power

The power features template isn't the appropriate place for this tag. 
The template includes important power infrastructure features such as 
power=line and some of the most essential attribute tags to these 
features such as voltage=*. Your proposed tag clearly doesn't belong 
there since it's not intended to be used with power features. It seems 
like it is rather to be used together with tourism=camp_site and similar 
features. Therefore it should be documented on 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Camp_site . I see that there are 
already various other attributes defined on that page and it would be 
natural to include your tag there as well.

Ole / opani

On 28/03/2015 22:35, Jan van Bekkum wrote:
> I did that, but somebody reversed it without telling me. I now put it in
> the tourism section.
>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 10:14 PM Michał Brzozowski <www.haxor at gmail.com
> <mailto:www.haxor at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     You have to edit the Map Features template.
>
>     Michał
>
>     On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Jan van Bekkum
>     <jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com <mailto:jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com>> wrote:
>      > I can't find how I get this in Map_Features. Can anybody help?
>      >
>      > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:04 PM Jan van Bekkum
>     <jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com <mailto:jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com>>
>      > wrote:
>      >>
>      >> The voting period is over. The proposal collected 10 approvals and 2
>      >> rejects. Therefore I moved it to state approved:
>      >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/__wiki/Power_supply:schedule
>     <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Power_supply:schedule>
>      >>
>      >> Met vriendelijke groet/with kind regards,
>      >>
>      >> Jan van Bekkum
>      >> www.DeEinderVoorbij.nl <http://www.DeEinderVoorbij.nl>
>      >>
>      >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Jan van Bekkum
>     <jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com <mailto:jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com>>
>      >> wrote:
>      >>>
>      >>> The set voting period is over. The proposal collected 7
>     approval votes,
>      >>> and 2 oppose votes (one without comment). I have extended the
>     voting period
>      >>> for another week.
>      >>>
>      >>> Regards,
>      >>>
>      >>> Jan
>      >>>
>      >>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 12:15 AM Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com
>     <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>> wrote:
>      >>>>
>      >>>> On 16/03/2015 9:41 AM, David Bannon wrote:
>      >>>> > On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 11:14 +0100, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
>      >>>> >
>      >>>> >> Where in the rules is the only persons who have participated
>      >>>> >> previously
>      >>>> >> allowed to vote?
>      >>>> > It most certainly does not say that. On the other hand,
>     sitting back
>      >>>> > and
>      >>>> > only being involved to vote 'no' is -
>      >>>> >
>      >>>> > 1. Bad manners. And any community has many unwritten manners
>     rules.
>      >>>> >
>      >>>> > 2. Unproductive. Lot of well meaning effort goes into a
>     proposal,
>      >>>> > where
>      >>>> > is the pleasure in killing it, apparently just for the sake
>     of killing
>      >>>> > it ?
>      >>>>
>      >>>> There is a lot more benefit in improving a tag. Please use the
>      >>>> comments/draft time to do that.
>      >>>>
>      >>>> >
>      >>>> > I would oppose firm rules like Jorg mentioned but, like any
>     community,
>      >>>> > we need to indicate clearly just what bad manners are !
>     Perhaps a
>      >>>> > short
>      >>>> > para on good manners on the voting page ?
>      >>>>
>      >>>> "Best Practice"? And it needs to be for the draft/comments
>     section. With
>      >>>> an expansion on the voting section?
>      >>>>
>      >>>> >
>      >>>> > David
>      >>>> >
>      >>>> >
>      >>>>
>      >>>>
>      >>>> _________________________________________________
>      >>>> Tagging mailing list
>      >>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>      >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.__org/listinfo/tagging
>     <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
>      >>
>      >>
>      >
>      > _________________________________________________
>      > Tagging mailing list
>      > Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>      > https://lists.openstreetmap.__org/listinfo/tagging
>     <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
>      >
>
>     _________________________________________________
>     Tagging mailing list
>     Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.__org/listinfo/tagging
>     <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>



More information about the Tagging mailing list