[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power_supply:schedule

Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com
Sun Mar 29 11:30:15 UTC 2015


Hello Ole,

I see your point, but it would have been nice if you would have let me know
that you removed the entry.

Regards,

Jan

On Sun, Mar 29, 2015, 13:11 Ole Nielsen <on-osm at xs4all.nl> wrote:

> I'm the one who reverted your edit to
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Map_Features:power
>
> The power features template isn't the appropriate place for this tag.
> The template includes important power infrastructure features such as
> power=line and some of the most essential attribute tags to these
> features such as voltage=*. Your proposed tag clearly doesn't belong
> there since it's not intended to be used with power features. It seems
> like it is rather to be used together with tourism=camp_site and similar
> features. Therefore it should be documented on
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Camp_site . I see that there are
> already various other attributes defined on that page and it would be
> natural to include your tag there as well.
>
> Ole / opani
>
> On 28/03/2015 22:35, Jan van Bekkum wrote:
> > I did that, but somebody reversed it without telling me. I now put it in
> > the tourism section.
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 10:14 PM Michał Brzozowski <www.haxor at gmail.com
> > <mailto:www.haxor at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     You have to edit the Map Features template.
> >
> >     Michał
> >
> >     On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Jan van Bekkum
> >     <jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com <mailto:jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >      > I can't find how I get this in Map_Features. Can anybody help?
> >      >
> >      > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:04 PM Jan van Bekkum
> >     <jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com <mailto:jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com>>
> >      > wrote:
> >      >>
> >      >> The voting period is over. The proposal collected 10 approvals
> and 2
> >      >> rejects. Therefore I moved it to state approved:
> >      >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/__wiki/Power_supply:schedule
> >     <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Power_supply:schedule>
> >      >>
> >      >> Met vriendelijke groet/with kind regards,
> >      >>
> >      >> Jan van Bekkum
> >      >> www.DeEinderVoorbij.nl <http://www.DeEinderVoorbij.nl>
> >      >>
> >      >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Jan van Bekkum
> >     <jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com <mailto:jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com>>
> >      >> wrote:
> >      >>>
> >      >>> The set voting period is over. The proposal collected 7
> >     approval votes,
> >      >>> and 2 oppose votes (one without comment). I have extended the
> >     voting period
> >      >>> for another week.
> >      >>>
> >      >>> Regards,
> >      >>>
> >      >>> Jan
> >      >>>
> >      >>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 12:15 AM Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com
> >     <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >      >>>>
> >      >>>> On 16/03/2015 9:41 AM, David Bannon wrote:
> >      >>>> > On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 11:14 +0100, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> >      >>>> >
> >      >>>> >> Where in the rules is the only persons who have participated
> >      >>>> >> previously
> >      >>>> >> allowed to vote?
> >      >>>> > It most certainly does not say that. On the other hand,
> >     sitting back
> >      >>>> > and
> >      >>>> > only being involved to vote 'no' is -
> >      >>>> >
> >      >>>> > 1. Bad manners. And any community has many unwritten manners
> >     rules.
> >      >>>> >
> >      >>>> > 2. Unproductive. Lot of well meaning effort goes into a
> >     proposal,
> >      >>>> > where
> >      >>>> > is the pleasure in killing it, apparently just for the sake
> >     of killing
> >      >>>> > it ?
> >      >>>>
> >      >>>> There is a lot more benefit in improving a tag. Please use the
> >      >>>> comments/draft time to do that.
> >      >>>>
> >      >>>> >
> >      >>>> > I would oppose firm rules like Jorg mentioned but, like any
> >     community,
> >      >>>> > we need to indicate clearly just what bad manners are !
> >     Perhaps a
> >      >>>> > short
> >      >>>> > para on good manners on the voting page ?
> >      >>>>
> >      >>>> "Best Practice"? And it needs to be for the draft/comments
> >     section. With
> >      >>>> an expansion on the voting section?
> >      >>>>
> >      >>>> >
> >      >>>> > David
> >      >>>> >
> >      >>>> >
> >      >>>>
> >      >>>>
> >      >>>> _________________________________________________
> >      >>>> Tagging mailing list
> >      >>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> >      >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.__org/listinfo/tagging
> >     <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
> >      >>
> >      >>
> >      >
> >      > _________________________________________________
> >      > Tagging mailing list
> >      > Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> >      > https://lists.openstreetmap.__org/listinfo/tagging
> >     <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
> >      >
> >
> >     _________________________________________________
> >     Tagging mailing list
> >     Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> >     https://lists.openstreetmap.__org/listinfo/tagging
> >     <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150329/b6c48fb8/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list