[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power_supply:schedule
Jan van Bekkum
jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com
Sun Mar 29 11:30:15 UTC 2015
Hello Ole,
I see your point, but it would have been nice if you would have let me know
that you removed the entry.
Regards,
Jan
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015, 13:11 Ole Nielsen <on-osm at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> I'm the one who reverted your edit to
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Map_Features:power
>
> The power features template isn't the appropriate place for this tag.
> The template includes important power infrastructure features such as
> power=line and some of the most essential attribute tags to these
> features such as voltage=*. Your proposed tag clearly doesn't belong
> there since it's not intended to be used with power features. It seems
> like it is rather to be used together with tourism=camp_site and similar
> features. Therefore it should be documented on
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Camp_site . I see that there are
> already various other attributes defined on that page and it would be
> natural to include your tag there as well.
>
> Ole / opani
>
> On 28/03/2015 22:35, Jan van Bekkum wrote:
> > I did that, but somebody reversed it without telling me. I now put it in
> > the tourism section.
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 10:14 PM Michał Brzozowski <www.haxor at gmail.com
> > <mailto:www.haxor at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > You have to edit the Map Features template.
> >
> > Michał
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Jan van Bekkum
> > <jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com <mailto:jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > I can't find how I get this in Map_Features. Can anybody help?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:04 PM Jan van Bekkum
> > <jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com <mailto:jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com>>
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> The voting period is over. The proposal collected 10 approvals
> and 2
> > >> rejects. Therefore I moved it to state approved:
> > >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/__wiki/Power_supply:schedule
> > <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Power_supply:schedule>
> > >>
> > >> Met vriendelijke groet/with kind regards,
> > >>
> > >> Jan van Bekkum
> > >> www.DeEinderVoorbij.nl <http://www.DeEinderVoorbij.nl>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Jan van Bekkum
> > <jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com <mailto:jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com>>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> The set voting period is over. The proposal collected 7
> > approval votes,
> > >>> and 2 oppose votes (one without comment). I have extended the
> > voting period
> > >>> for another week.
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>>
> > >>> Jan
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 12:15 AM Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com
> > <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 16/03/2015 9:41 AM, David Bannon wrote:
> > >>>> > On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 11:14 +0100, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >> Where in the rules is the only persons who have participated
> > >>>> >> previously
> > >>>> >> allowed to vote?
> > >>>> > It most certainly does not say that. On the other hand,
> > sitting back
> > >>>> > and
> > >>>> > only being involved to vote 'no' is -
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > 1. Bad manners. And any community has many unwritten manners
> > rules.
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > 2. Unproductive. Lot of well meaning effort goes into a
> > proposal,
> > >>>> > where
> > >>>> > is the pleasure in killing it, apparently just for the sake
> > of killing
> > >>>> > it ?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> There is a lot more benefit in improving a tag. Please use the
> > >>>> comments/draft time to do that.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > I would oppose firm rules like Jorg mentioned but, like any
> > community,
> > >>>> > we need to indicate clearly just what bad manners are !
> > Perhaps a
> > >>>> > short
> > >>>> > para on good manners on the voting page ?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> "Best Practice"? And it needs to be for the draft/comments
> > section. With
> > >>>> an expansion on the voting section?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > David
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> _________________________________________________
> > >>>> Tagging mailing list
> > >>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> > >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.__org/listinfo/tagging
> > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________
> > > Tagging mailing list
> > > Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> > > https://lists.openstreetmap.__org/listinfo/tagging
> > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
> > >
> >
> > _________________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.__org/listinfo/tagging
> > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150329/b6c48fb8/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list