[Tagging] RFC - proposal page for camp_site=

[John Willis]

> On Mar 30, 2015, at 6:17 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Some things might make sense to be seen as attributes on the camp_site, e.g. whether there is power available, while others like the presence of a restaurant or a shop should be better mapped as objects on their own.

I guess that makes sense. 

I was thinking of tagging the tiny amenities that you would find at each site that might be very difficult to map, such as water, power, etc.

But I guess if you can map the spaces area (pitches?) then I guess they could be an attribute of the space. 

Javbw