[Tagging] recommend tagging of volcanos as ways rather than nodes
janjko at gmail.com
Mon Mar 30 14:58:00 UTC 2015
In a broader sense, volcano is a mountain that appeared after a volcano
blew up. The problem is, we don't yet have a way of mapping mountains.
There was a suggestion to map a mountain by tagging mountain=xyz on all
entities that define a mountain, that is peaks, ridges, mountain passes and
such. Maybe we could use features mentioned by Richard Z.
(geological=volcanic_lava_channel, geological=volcanic_caldera_rim) and
give them all the same volcano=xyz tag.
pon, 30. ožu 2015. u 16:51 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> 2015-03-30 15:25 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. <ricoz.osm at gmail.com>:
>> no it was not. As pointed out in wiki it was part of the original
>> proposal, Geozeisig only corrected the infobox to reflect what
>> the text says.
> thank you for pointing this out, I wasn't aware of it. Still, 5% of all
> volcanos are mapped on ways.
>> > Are there objections to put this back to areas or nodes? Is there
>> > for such an action?
>> objections here. volcano is not here to map the crater rim.
> actually it is not clear what exactly that node stands for, the wiki
> currently says: "[node] Place it as close to the centre of the main
> crater/caldera/vent as you can."
> (none of this in the proposal btw.). I still believe that "volcano" is the
> name for the whole geologic structure, and an area is not wrong.
> The original proposal dates back to 2007, please be aware that by that
> time a lot of objects were mapped as nodes which now are mapped as areas.
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging