[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting camp_type=*

[Jan van Bekkum]

Hi Dave,

Thanks for the comment. I have made the change.

Regards,

Jan

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:04 AM Dave Swarthout <daveswarthout at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Good work Jan. This is something I can use until the extra work is done to
> make classifications by amenity level easier.
>
> One small thing in terms of language usage. It isn't correct to say
> campgrounds are "opportunistic activities". Campgrounds are a thing, a
> noun, while an activity is an action. A campground cannot be an action. If
> you change the wording to "campgrounds that are opportunistic in nature"
> (or in character) that will make it grammatically correct.
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Jan van Bekkum <jan.vanbekkum at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> After an intensive discussion (see  [Tagging] Tagging established,
>> unofficial and wild campings) that has resulted in substantial modification
>> of the content and scope of the original proposal please cast your votes
>> for the reworked version. It has been kept as lean and focussed as possible.
>>
>> Proposal:
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/camp_type%3D*
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jan van Bekkum
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dave Swarthout
> Homer, Alaska
> Chiang Mai, Thailand
> Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
>  _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150331/97f80499/attachment.html>