[Tagging] Tagging of historic=monument

[Warin]

On 7/05/2015 3:18 PM, Marc Gemis wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com 
> <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     That proposal has no listings for  Australia (possibly
>     www.*nationaltrust*.org.au/ <http://org.au/> ?) and ignores
>     British www.*nationaltrust*.org.uk/ <http://org.uk/> ?
>     I've no idea how the 'level' is decided .. while it gives some
>     examples, it does not look like it has any explanation of how to
>     determine this.
>     It is a proposal ... and needs some work? Certainly more
>     explanation. At the moment I cannot use the heritage tag.
>
>
> I thought "level" should correspond to the admin level of the 
> institute that lists the object. E.g. when it is done on country level 
> -> 2. In Belgium it is done on regional level  (Flanders, Brussels, 
> Wallonia) -> 4.
>
> regards
>
> m
>

If taken that way then the British and Australian National Trusts would 
level 2.

If it is not clear (as in very obvious) to me .. then it probably is not 
clear to others....
Stating how the level is determine would be more usefull than the table 
as the table will never cover all instances.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150507/74c386ae/attachment.html>