[Tagging] Tagging of historic=monument

[Marc Gemis]

It's under "Tagging", it's mentioned twice, once under "Main tag", once
under "Secondary tags"



On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:

>  On 7/05/2015 3:18 PM, Marc Gemis wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> That proposal has no listings for  Australia (possibly  www.
>> *nationaltrust*.org.au/  ?) and ignores British www.*nationaltrust*.
>> org.uk/ ?
>> I've no idea how the 'level' is decided .. while it gives some examples,
>> it does not look like it has any explanation of how to determine this.
>> It is a proposal ... and needs some work? Certainly more explanation. At
>> the moment I cannot use the heritage tag.
>>
>
> I thought "level" should correspond to the admin level of the institute
> that lists the object. E.g. when it is done on country level -> 2. In
> Belgium it is done on regional level  (Flanders, Brussels, Wallonia) -> 4.
>
>  regards
>
>  m
>
>
> If taken that way then the British and Australian National Trusts would
> level 2.
>
> If it is not clear (as in very obvious) to me .. then it probably is not
> clear to others....
> Stating how the level is determine would be more usefull than the table as
> the table will never cover all instances.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150507/f58b08c8/attachment.html>