[Tagging] man_made=works

[John Willis]

> On May 30, 2015, at 12:41 AM, Daniel Koć <daniel at koć.pl> wrote:
> 
> But if not, we have no system, just historical cases and a lot of exceptions. I think it's time to try to make some rules instead.

I though there was some tag prefix like disused: or abandoned: that could be used with the building=industrial to note what its original purpose was for. 

Maybe you are just supposed to use building=church and shop=poodles for a church that was converted into a poodle shop - but i imagine that would be only if it was really really obvious that it was a church, not just by its shape, but by the presence of original fixtures and ornamental architecture - not just that it has a steeple on one side. 

There has to be some threshold - there are Hundreds and hundreds of  7-11s that closed in Japan that are now repurposed - but you know exactly that it was a 7-11 based on architecture alone - but i don't feel tagging building=convenience_store + shop=poodles on it helps anyone. 

Javbw