[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Power utility office
Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Wed Nov 4 08:12:56 UTC 2015
sent from a phone
Am 04.11.2015 um 07:16 schrieb John Willis <johnw at mac.com>:
>> The network is ran/owned by a government institution, the actual power distribution by commercial providers. So when you want a contract to get electricity you go to a commercial entity. So building=civic is not suitable there (I think)
>
> This is a good point, and one of the reasons that the proposal was narrowed down to exclude utilities, including only things commonly done by governments.
I believe the tag for the entity inside a building should not be a subtag of building but should be something like office or amenity. The building tag is about the building itself, regardless of its current utilization. building =civic would all be some sort of administration building (similar level of detail I guess)? Or would you want to add buildings with specific functions as well (e.g. water purification plants, road maintenance depot, prisons, fire station, homeland security, ...)?
cheers
Martin
More information about the Tagging
mailing list