[Tagging] highway=residential_link

[Colin Smale]

The fact that tools don't currently support something is no reason to
oppose its introduction either. If it were, we would never be able to
change anything. 

On 2015-11-11 21:26, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: 

> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:50:41 +0100
> Joachim <noreply at freedom-x.de> wrote:
> 
>> Many see _link only as slip roads. But using it for at-grade junctions
>> like described in the wiki has one advantage: _link is usually tagged
>> without a name because it connects two named roads and has none
>> itself. Using no link gives many warning in QA tools. Using
>> highway=residential plus noname=yes might be a workaround in the
>> current situation.
> 
> False positive in QA tool is not a good reason to force everybody to
> handle residential_link, service_link etc
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20151111/e231d2dd/attachment.html>