[Tagging] Sidewalk Tagging for Routing
Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Tue Nov 24 11:17:53 UTC 2015
2015-11-24 11:45 GMT+01:00 Colin Smale <colin.smale at xs4all.nl>:
> So has the "street" relation just been born? It could solve some other
> puzzles as well: dual carriageways, cycle tracks, bridges...
bridges have been solved by introducing a revolutionary concept: a
dedicated object for an explicit bridge. It remains a mystery why it took
us 10 years ;-)
Have a look at man_made=bridge, doesn't even require relations.
The "street relation" has not only been born, it has already died, at least
almost. Like its cousing, the associatedstreet street (which seems more
live than the street relation). Honestly, I don't understand what these
relations could solve in conjunction with dual carriageways, could you
explain?
Generally we should avoid relations where they are not necessary. No need
for a relation to say these street parts do share the same name. Simply put
the same name on them.
Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20151124/5f7c6393/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list