[Tagging] Decorative flower fields? (not as a crop?)

[Dudley Ibbett]

In think the word you may be looking for is "ornamental".  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ornamental_plant

Could you use landuse=field?  The wiki suggests it has been abandoned but perhaps it should be used in the context.  Presumably you could then add, field=ornamental_flowers. 

Regards

Dudley



> From: dieterdreist at gmail.com
> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:53:45 +0100
> To: tagging at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Decorative flower fields? (not as a crop?)
> 
> 
> 
> sent from a phone
> 
> > Am 29.11.2015 um 14:02 schrieb John Willis <johnw at mac.com>:
> > 
> > Thinking of creating landuse=flower_display For sections of land that a cultivated with flowers for decorative/attraction purposes -
> 
> 
> I think that's too specific for landuse. "exhibitional" isn't a proper word I guess, but something like it might be a more generic approach. Still, if there are just some foreign  flowers brought into a natural setting, and without maintenance, I would prefer an attribute approach which doesn't "occupy" the landuse object but can be associated to other features like forests, meadows etc. (this for cases where you are not tagging the individual plant)
> 
> cheers 
> Martin 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20151129/77f6dbf1/attachment.html>