[Tagging] waterway=penstock to complete pipeline tagging
Christoph Hormann
chris_hormann at gmx.de
Mon Oct 5 12:10:04 UTC 2015
On Monday 05 October 2015, François Lacombe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> How would you feel about considering waterway=penstock beside of
> waterway=canal, waterway=drain to complete pipeline tagging scheme ?
>
Not such a good idea - that would be correctly tagged as
man_made=pipeline.
A short tubed section of a regular waterway like below a bridge or dam
can be tagged waterway=* + tunnel=yes, a longer tube should always be
man_made=pipeline.
waterway=penstock would also lack any functional distinction that would
normally be encoded in the waterway tag - data users would have no way
to decide how treat such feature. It would just say 'this waterway is
tubed' not what kind of waterway it is (artificial/natural, clean/dirty
water etc.)
--
Christoph Hormann
http://www.imagico.de/
More information about the Tagging
mailing list