[Tagging] new access value
ricoz.osm at gmail.com
Mon Oct 5 22:50:32 UTC 2015
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 04:44:30PM +0200, Simon Poole wrote:
> Am 05.10.2015 um 16:36 schrieb Richard:
> > ... just trying to imagine the poor router trying to decide how to
> > route such an area.
> While some of the OSM specific routers haven't implemented it at this
> point in time, in general routers have no issue at all with it. The
> rough US-equivalent from a routing pov is "No Thru Traffic" (to avoid
> lengthy discussions about the exact semantics, note that I wrote
> "routing pov").
"No Thru Traffic" works, however is not quite equivalent to what Austrian
law wants with Anrainerverkehr.
A router trying to implement the Autrian law should ask the driver a bunch
of questions regarding the purpose of the travel and route accordingly.
More information about the Tagging