[Tagging] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle

[Warin]

On 13/10/2015 11:03 PM, Hubert wrote:
>
> I don’t know why. Anyone please correct me if I’m wrong. My guess is, 
> that it’s a historically grown reason, for OSM (especially all highway 
> related stuff) has been/ is defined with double-tracked motor vehicles 
> in mind.
>

Car centric. And that is where most people want their data.


It also does not count foot 'lanes'.

> Also, what tools are you talking about?
>
> *From:*Paul Johnson [mailto:baloo at ursamundi.org]
> *Sent:* Dienstag, 13. Oktober 2015 13:40
> *To:* Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
> *Subject:* Re: [Tagging] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle
>
> But why?  It seems tools aren't expecting lanes tags with more lanes 
> than in the lanes count.  Seems exceptionally arbitrary and very 
> incomplete to count only lanes that a sedan can use.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20151014/7ca5e6ee/attachment-0001.html>