[Tagging] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle

Hubert sg.forum at gmx.de
Thu Oct 29 12:11:50 UTC 2015


Thanks for the link. 

I agree for „lanes=*“.

 

But “*:lanes=*” is still a different story. One could also use “*:lanes=*” on segregated foot- and cycleways. For example

highway=path

degregated=yes

bicycle=designated 

bicycle:lanes=yes|no

foot=designated 

foot:lanes=no|yes 

 

Although this example is pretty trivial.

 

Hubert87

From: Steve Doerr [mailto:doerr.stephen at gmail.com] 
Sent: Donnerstag, 29. Oktober 2015 12:21
To: tagging at openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle

 

UN convention, apparently:

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2011-September/008578.html

Steve



On 13/10/2015 12:40, Paul Johnson wrote:

But why?  It seems tools aren't expecting lanes tags with more lanes than in the lanes count.  Seems exceptionally arbitrary and very incomplete to count only lanes that a sedan can use.

 

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Hubert <sg.forum at gmx.de> wrote:

Hey Paul, 

 

„lanes=*“[1] is for the total number of car traffic lanes and should not be confused with the “:lanes” suffix [2].

So “highway=* + oneway=yes + lanes=2 + cycleway=lane” is correct.

 

However, your

motor_vehicle:lanes=yes|no|yes

bicycle:lanes=yes|designated|yes

is correct, too. 

 

Yours Hubert

 

[1]  <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes

[2]  <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes

 

From: Paul Johnson [mailto:baloo at ursamundi.org] 
Sent: Dienstag, 13. Oktober 2015 13:06
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: [Tagging] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle

 

Seems like some of the examples are wrong.  For example, M2c...

 

Wouldn't it be better and more consistent relative to other mode-specific lanes to tag it as...

 

oneway=yes

cycleway=lane

lanes=3

motor_vehicle:lanes=yes|no|yes

bicycle:lanes=yes|designated|yes

 

 


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

 






_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging





  _____  


 <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> Avast logo

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. 
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>  

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20151029/f2776bc0/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list