[Tagging] Construction

[Paul Johnson]

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> > Am 30.08.2015 um 22:32 schrieb Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org>:
> >
> > construction=minor.  Also, if known, consider access:lanes=yes|no|no
> (vary as appropriate) as well.
>
>
> you could split the highway and adjust the "lanes" value according to the
> current state (i.e. count only accessible lanes, not those where the
> construction is happening).
>

>From experience, this gets messy *quickly* compared to just changing lane
access when not working with temporary roadways (which itself is another
hot mess).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150901/3d0be14e/attachment.html>