[Tagging] Deprecate amenity=youth_centre in favour of sub-tag community_centre=* or community_centre:for=*

[Janko Mihelić]

There is amenity=arts_centre which is a subclass of
amenity=community_centre. It's used 11 688 times. So the cat's out of the
bag, why wouldn't you use youth_centre if we already use art_centre?

But another thing bothers me with youth_centre, and that is, what if it is
an arts_centre for youths? In that case we could use the social_facility
scheme, and put arts_centre:for=youth. But if it's a community_centre for
youths to do anything, I wouldn't be against amenity=youth_centre.

Janko

pon, 21. ruj 2015. u 10:49 Tom Pfeifer <t.pfeifer at computer.org> napisao je:

> To prevent tag fragmentation, I think that amenity=youth_centre
> should be deprecated, and tagged
>
>     amenity=community_centre
>     community_centre=youth[_centre]
>
> amenity=community_centre is used 29307 times, and rendered with icon
> and name on the general map.
>
> The wiki definition of community_centre includes youth centres, among
> other locations targeted at specific age groups. Thus it makes sense
> to specify them with a sub-tag.
>
> amenity=youth_centre is only listed as a "tag being used" in the wiki,
> and used 759 times. An overpass query shows that these uses focus
> mainly on Germany and England (UK).
>
> Sub-tagging with community_centre=* was already proposed on the talk
> page in 2010, though the key is only used 71 times so far, for describing
> the target groups, such as =children or =elder
>
> An alternative would be to reserve the community_centre=* for the type
> of the facility (e.g. =meeting_room, assembly_hall), and follow the scheme
> introduced in social_facility:for=*, that means defining
> community_centre:for=*,
> with mostly the same values. The social_facility:for scheme is well
> supported
> with 8534 uses. Example:
>
>    amenity=community_centre
>    community_centre:for=juvenile
>
>
> tom
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20150921/f1e82e44/attachment-0001.html>