[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Education 2.0

[Александр Шишкин]

Well, I (or anyone else) can not just force mappers to use or not to use
certain tags. Only way to deal with it is to give them better way to tag
things. That's what this proposal is about.

2016-04-14 10:06 GMT+03:00 Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com>:

> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Шишкин Александр (Shishkin Ale
> <kedermail at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I assume that tags related to education that have been approved and do
> not
> > have "education" key should remain (not sure what to do with unapproved
> > tags).
>
> I cannot advise on that. Not everybody is giving the same weight to
> the approval process. A usage of  7681 for amenity=driving school is
> not something that can be neglected IMHO, even when it's not approved
> (given they were not all imported by 1 person).
>
> m.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20160414/84a6c7d3/attachment.html>