[Tagging] highway=service major type sub-classification - mini vote

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> Il giorno 16 apr 2016, alle ore 20:03, Michał Brzozowski <www.haxor at gmail.com> ha scritto:
> 
> I think you miss the point. When there's no service key, you have no
> idea whether it doesn't fit in the current set of (parking_aisle,
> driveway...), or it is indeed but hasn't been tagged because the
> mapper didn't provide this information. It's an informational
> consistency problem, peculiarity of the way we handle things, namely
> non-distinction between "inapplicable" and "unknown".


I am aware of this, but I don't consider it important in this case. The same holds true for any tag, e.g. on highways the tags oneway, surface, bicycle, snow_mobile, width, maxheight, lanes, maxspeed, bus, taxi, emergency, access, foot, footway, bridge, tunnel etc.
Should we add all those tags to make explicitly clear they weren't forgotten to look at (e.g. lanes=2, tunnel=no, bridge=no, surface=asphalt, oneway=no, access=yes, footway=both, maxheight=none, taxi=yes....)?


cheers,
Martin