[Tagging] highway=service major type sub-classification - mini vote

[Tom Pfeifer]

Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 2016/04/17 08:17:
> I am aware of this, but I don't consider it important in this case. The same holds true for any tag, e.g. on highways the tags oneway, surface, bicycle, snow_mobile, width, maxheight, lanes, maxspeed, bus, taxi, emergency, access, foot, footway, bridge, tunnel etc.
> Should we add all those tags to make explicitly clear they weren't forgotten to look at (e.g. lanes=2, tunnel=no, bridge=no, surface=asphalt, oneway=no, access=yes, footway=both, maxheight=none, taxi=yes....)?

Not every of these, but in a city that consists mostly of oneways, e.g. Barcelona,
the occasional oneway=no is helpful. That's why the service subtag is supposed to
be voluntary.

tom