[Tagging] Proposal for standardization of sidewalk schema (+ import)
ajt1047 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 4 07:45:32 UTC 2016
On 04/08/2016 02:35, Mike Thompson wrote:
> I tested out the proposed mapping/tagging scheme in my local area
> (http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/40.49192/-105.05655 - not
> claiming I did it perfectly). I didn't think it was especially
> difficult. Drawing the additional ways took a little more time, but
> offered the advantage that you received a good visual as to whether
> all the sidewalks had been correctly mapped.
Thanks for sharing that. One question though - would it make sense to
use "sidewalk=separate" (see
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/sidewalk#values ) on
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33496127 ? That way it's clear to all
data consumers that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33496127 exists as
a sidewalk for it.
I'm guessing that there may be some connections (and possibly kerbs)
missing, so that a foot router that navigated people over kerbs wouldn't
but take a more direct route across the intersection and along a bit?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging