[Tagging] Voting rules

Dominic Coletti dcoletti.dcair at gmail.com
Wed Feb 24 17:57:06 UTC 2016


Do you have an alternative? For example, incorporating Taginfo into the
process.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:39 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> Am 23.02.2016 um 22:48 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at gmail.com>:
>
> >>> Approval rate: 68.97%. Less than required 74% so provisional
> >>> rejection; proposer to make final call.
> >>
> >> The tricky bit of course is that those percentages are "of the people
> >> who voted".
> >
> > It is not surprising that only people who voted were voting.
>
>
> yes, but it's surprising that we have made changes to the tagging system
> via wiki so incredibly difficult. A minority of few more than a quarter of
> all contributors could block the rest (e.g. if all of them voted) in a
> decision. This is completely theoretical of course, but it illustrates that
> there's likely something wrong with the current way of counting votes in
> the wiki.
>
> cheers,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-- 

*C/CMSgt Dominic Coletti, CAP*
Whiskey Flight Sergeant, Raleigh-Wake Composite Squadron
(H) 919-463-9554
U.S. Air Force Auxiliary
GoCivilAirPatrol.com <http://www.gocivilairpatrol.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/pages/Civil-Air-Patrol/107647995924164>
<http://instagram.com/civil__air__patrol>
<https://twitter.com/civilairpatrol>
<https://www.flickr.com/photos/civilairpatrol/sets/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20160224/85a7a9c3/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list