[Tagging] landuse=farmland and highway=track
f at zz.de
Mon Jan 11 08:09:59 UTC 2016
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 08:21:30AM +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am currently (armchair) mapping rural areas in Japan, that means realigning nearly all
> existing ways.
> Whenever I am mapping landuse=farmland areas I wonder whether I should
> 1) draw one rather large polygon stretching across all highway=track ways
> and small buildings which are likely used by the farmer and waterway=ditch ways or
> 2) draw small polygons so that none of these objects is "covered".
> Obviously option 1) is easier and results in rather few landuse polygons while 2) is
> much more work and results in many typically nearly rectangular shapes.
I am not so religious about covering tracks in farmland. The point is
that huge polygons tend to break much more often and tend to be much
harder to modify/fix. I personally keep polygons small for that reason.
Also there are much more fine grained tags for agricultural land e.g.
meadow etc - Typically when you map farmland and do it right it does not
grow that huge. You have small wooden strips, waterways with
scrub around, roads etc. I typically even break up at field boundaries
seen in differences in plant growths etc as thats typically the
boundary for changes in usage in the future.
Florian Lohoff f at zz.de
We need to self-defend - GnuPG/PGP enable your email today!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the Tagging