[Tagging] "no right turn on red" tagging?

Johnparis okosm at johnfreed.com
Sat Jul 2 16:06:20 UTC 2016


Ooh, I think Martin's suggestion would become a MAJOR project.

If I recall correctly, "right turn permitted on red after stop" is the
traffic law in the entire United States with the sole exception of New York
City. (Wikipedia says this has been the case since late 1978.)

Are you seriously suggesting that virtually every single traffic signal in
the United States be tagged with "right turn permitted on red after stop"
instead of tagging the few with "no turn on red"? How does this comport
with the notion of tagging what you see -- the only signs you'll see in the
USA are "no turn on red" (with the exception of NYC).

John


Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 17:06:59 +0200
> From: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
>         <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] "no right turn on red" tagging?
> Message-ID: <45FED486-3423-40D5-80E4-5D6406FE0202 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > Il giorno 02 lug 2016, alle ore 16:55, Nathan Wessel <
nate.wessel at mail.utoronto.ca> ha critto:
> >
> >
> > Who is right here? Should I report this as a bug and change the wiki to
allow turns on ^no_.*" relations as standard or should the tagging be
changed? And how?
> >
>
>
> right turn on red is something that isn't generally allowed, some
countries do, some do if additional signs are posted. I'd suggest to
explicitly tag the positive case (right turn on red is allowed), rather
than assuming a default of yes and tag the negative cases.
>
> cheers,
> Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20160702/32115c66/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list