[Tagging] sloped_curb, kerb and god knows what left in limbo ......

Simon Poole simon at poole.ch
Thu Mar 3 11:24:07 UTC 2016

As pointed in my first mail out the issue is deprecating an existing
scheme in the wiki without replacing it with something else that is
either recognized as "how we do it now" or "approved" (the issue is not
that there is yet another scheme bit rotting in proposal state).

My question was solely if there is some consensus that the kerb proposal
is actually how it should be tagged now or if it is truly defunct and
the original tagging scheme should continued to be used (as iD does).


Am 03.03.2016 um 11:58 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> 2016-03-03 11:43 GMT+01:00 Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch
> <mailto:simon at poole.ch>>:
>     The problem is "we" didn't. As already pointed out, there is only
>     a proposal that has been bit-rotting for multiple years (it
>     probably, when used on a crossing node, should have kerb:right and
>     kerb:left variants for the asymmetric cases, but that is the only
>     thing I see that might be improved). There's not even a JOSM
>     preset for it. 
> What is wrong with the proposal ("bitrotting")? The tag it documents
> are used 24.000+ times. I agree with the addition of direction
> dependent tags for asymetric situations, you should put this on the
> discussion page, maybe in this paragraph:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/kerb#Kerb_direction
> Cheers,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20160303/7eb41f81/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20160303/7eb41f81/attachment.sig>

More information about the Tagging mailing list