[Tagging] building=yes for multiple building
davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com
Wed Mar 16 15:38:45 UTC 2016
As Simon P says "we allow and support progression from rough to more
To use your terrace example:
building=yes is OK, but far from perfect
building=terrace is good, but there's still room for improvement
mapping each house & tagging them building=house/office etc is much
better especially if combined with other tags such as addresses.
What detail you decide to map to is up to you, depending on time & patience.
On 16/03/2016 14:47, joost schouppe wrote:
> Is it OK to map multiple buildings as one closed line with the
> building=yes tag? Or does building=yes imply it is one single building?
> There is the terrace value, but that implies one orderly structure,
> not the hodgepodge of houses, buildings and extensions that define
> organically grown blocks.
> There are a couple of "multiple" values too, which make sense, but is
> undocumented and maybe overly precise.
> Joost @
> Openstreetmap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> |
> Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup
> <http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/members/97979802/> |
> Reddit <https://www.reddit.com/u/joostjakob> | Wordpress
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging