[Tagging] setting proposals to abandoned

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at gmail.com
Sat Mar 26 10:49:43 UTC 2016


On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 11:06:34 +0100
Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:

> I wonder what others think about changing the status of proposals in
> draft mode to abandoned in the wiki. Is this something we want
> everyone to do after a certain time, or should this be reserved to
> the original proponent? Would the situation be different if the
> status wasn't draft but proposed? If you think everybody should be
> able to abandon other people's proposals, what would be a reasonable
> timespan? Does it depend on the actual usage of the proposed tags,
> and if yes, what would be a reasonable threshold?
> 
> FWIW, the actual reason for this mail now is this edit, but I'm more
> interested to learn about your general considerations:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/childcare2.0&diff=next&oldid=1128997
> 
> 
> cheers,
> Martin 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Some time ago I set some obviously abandoned proposals to abandoned, I
see no reason for "reserved to the original proponent"

"what would be a reasonable threshold" - no edits in this or previous
year is my typical method to recognise something on internet as dead.



More information about the Tagging mailing list