[Tagging] setting proposals to abandoned

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> Am 27.03.2016 um 23:23 schrieb Tom Pfeifer <t.pfeifer at computer.org>:
> 
> I just watched that talk and fully disagree. The talk was using anecdotes
> as evidence and quite rhetorical. The proposal cited as example was rejected
> because it was immature and self-contradictory and had a fuzzy scope, not because
> the male contributors to OSM would not be able to classify child care facilities,
> or not interested in.


+1, while there likely is some truth in the observation that osm has a finer grained differentiation in topics men are supposedly more interested in (not very surprising, looking at gender distribution amongst the contributors and how tags come to life in osm), this talk did reveal few insights and the actual example of the rejected proposal was ill chosen. 


cheers,
Martin