[Tagging] Hunting area tagging

[Warin]

On 23-Oct-16 05:32 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> Il giorno 22 ott 2016, alle ore 11:57, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>
>> For an area dedicated to the hunting of game then landuse=hunting would be better than using amenity.
>> It is a use of the land. And any use of the land is an amenity to someone, so it is more specific than the amenity key.
>
> I would avoid 'landuse' as this would obviously conflict with other landuses like forest. Hunting will rarely be an exclusive landuse.
>

? I responded to your post

On 22-Oct-16 08:07 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:

> In case of a property, you could use "hunting=*", in case of a
> dedicated area it could be something like amenity=hunting_area /
> hunting_resort or similar.

And reiterate your words " in case of a dedicated area" and
mine "For an area dedicated to the hunting of game then landuse=hunting" ..
I think that is fairly clear ... dedicated, primary use is hunting.

Most 'landuse' have more than one function, but the primary use is tagged.

If the primary use is forest then it could be tagged landuse=forest with a secondary tag of hunting=* as you have put forward.
If the primary use is hunting then landuse=hunting should be used.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20161023/bacd1e0d/attachment.html>