[Tagging] Hunting area tagging

[Warin]

On 25-Oct-16 03:57 AM, Yves wrote:
> Puting aside the pleasure to debate over landuse and landcover, what 
> about defining hunting = as a permission tag, and invent a new polygon 
> type dedicated to define a hunting area boundary where no other 
> polygon is suitable to add this tag to?
> Yves

Nice idea. Thank you Yves for thinking of the basics.
>
>
> Le 24 octobre 2016 13:29:21 GMT+02:00, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> a 
> écrit :
>
>     On 24-Oct-16 07:54 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>
>>     2016-10-23 11:48 GMT+02:00 Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>>:
>>
>>         And reiterate your words " in case of a dedicated area" and
>>         mine "For an area dedicated to the hunting of game then landuse=hunting" ..
>>         I think that is fairly clear ... dedicated, primary use is hunting.
>>
>>         Most 'landuse' have more than one function, but the primary use is tagged.
>>
>>         If the primary use is forest then it could be tagged landuse=forest with a secondary tag of hunting=* as you have put forward.
>>         If the primary use is hunting then landuse=hunting should be used.
>>
>>
>>
>>     who is declaring the "primary use"?
>     The mapper - as usual.
>>     How would you judge this?
>     Same as I would judge anything else - from the available evidence.
>>     landuse=forest is the only widely accepted way to tag an area
>>     where trees grow (besides mapping single trees, and besides the
>>     landcover=trees property which I myself try to push and besides
>>     the natural=wood tag which is disputed in meaning because of the
>>     unclear term "natural"), i.e. if you decided that a forest was
>>     meant "primarily for hunting", you couldn't map it as a forest...
>
>     I would use the following combination;
>
>     landuse=hunting
>     landcover=trees
>     natural=wood (I too don't 'like' this and for that reason I tend
>     to dual tag with the landcover=trees tag. However natural=wood is
>     'widely accepted', just not by some)
>
>     If the area were primarily used for the production of tees and/or
>     their products with hunting as another use I would use the
>     following combination;
>
>     landuse=forest
>     hunting=yes (or permissive etc)
>
>     -------------------
>     To me landuse=forest is only for areas where trees are grown for
>     the production of products from those trees e.g. lumber, wood
>     pulp, oils, rubber, maple syrup
>
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     Tagging mailing list
>     Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
> -- Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma 
> brièveté. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20161025/22025d52/attachment.html>