[Tagging] Cenotaph WAS Re: Tagging memorial sites

Janko Mihelić janjko at gmail.com
Wed Sep 21 10:57:56 UTC 2016


sri, 21. ruj 2016. 02:59 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> je
napisao:

>
>  You can (also additionally) add a memorial:type=cenotaph.
>

Memorial:type is a bad tag. Look at the values:

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/memorial%3Atype#values

There's obelisk, and then there is war_memorial. They are different
classes. A war_memorial or a cenotaph could be an obelisk, plaque or
whatewer. Additionally, a war_memorial is often a cenotaph. Majority of
values now show the form of the memorial, so we should stick to that.

>
Maybe just cenotaph=yes? That way a tomb can have the same tag. Something
can be a functional grave, just with no body (maybe the body was removed,
or it was expected to be found). Or it can just be a memorial, said to be a
cenotaph.

Janko
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20160921/cd18c5a3/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list