[Tagging] Quonset hut

[Wolfgang Zenker]

* Michał Brzozowski <www.haxor at gmail.com> [170413 16:41]:
> I don't see how going from "typology" you conclude it's strictly about
> form. Typology is about types, not saying with respect to what.
> When you look at top building values in Taginfo, it's clear to me
> these state purpose (house, residential, garage, apartments,
> industrial, school and so on), with only exception being hut, other
> non-purpose values from the first page are in fact non-buildings
> (roof).

I'm in between here: building typology would depend on the original
purpose of the building, but that would not necessary still be the
current purpose of the building. So, if a building had originally
been constructed as a church and is built in the style of a church,
but is now used as a restaurant, it would be tagged amenity=restaurant,
building=church.

Wolfgang
(lyx at osm)