[Tagging] Feature Proposal - 2nd RFC - Improve Toilet Tagging

[Michael Reichert]

Hi Micah,

Am 2017-04-14 um 18:49 schrieb Micah Cochran:
> I've rewrote the proposal for improving toilet tagging.  This is a second
> request for comments.
> 
> Now this proposal tags for occupancy (single or multi), gender/group
> designation
> of toilets that are within a place (where tagged "toilet=yes"), and a
> prefix tagging scheme that will make the tags only apply to a
> group(gender) designation
> toilet.  (For example, it allow you to be able to tag that there are
> urinals in the men's room, but not the women's room.)
> 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Toilet_Tagging_Improvements
> 
> Please put comments in the proposal's discussion section.

The wiki page currently contains many paragraphs which are struck out.
Could you please delete them because they are no longer proposed by your
proposal? The OpenSTreetMap Wiki has a version history of each page
which shows you who edited the page at which time.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/Toilet_Tagging_Improvements&action=history
That's why I think that the section "Revision Notes" is also not necessary.

You can add a link to the previous discussions on the mailing lists
which are the reason for the changes of your proposal. That would be
great for people in future who want to understand your changes and why
things are as they are.

Best regards

Michael



-- 
Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten
ausgenommen)
I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20170414/8fcf18b6/attachment-0001.sig>