[Tagging] Feature Proposal - 2nd RFC - Improve Toilet Tagging

[Micah Cochran]

Hello Michael,

Thank you for the suggestion.  I have made those changes to the proposal.

Sincerely,
Micah
-- 

*Micah Cochran*

GIS Coordinator  -  City of Athens  -  Engineering Services & Community
Development Dept.  -  Dept. of Public Works Building  -  1600 ELM ST W,
Athens, AL  <http://g.co/maps/ncrp7> - geo:34.820608,-86.991474 -  p.
256-233-2224  -  f. 256-233-8791 - www.athensalabama.us
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Michael Reichert <nakaner at gmx.net> wrote:

> Hi Micah,
>
> Am 2017-04-14 um 18:49 schrieb Micah Cochran:
> > I've rewrote the proposal for improving toilet tagging.  This is a second
> > request for comments.
> >
> > Now this proposal tags for occupancy (single or multi), gender/group
> > designation
> > of toilets that are within a place (where tagged "toilet=yes"), and a
> > prefix tagging scheme that will make the tags only apply to a
> > group(gender) designation
> > toilet.  (For example, it allow you to be able to tag that there are
> > urinals in the men's room, but not the women's room.)
> >
> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/
> Toilet_Tagging_Improvements
> >
> > Please put comments in the proposal's discussion section.
>
> The wiki page currently contains many paragraphs which are struck out.
> Could you please delete them because they are no longer proposed by your
> proposal? The OpenSTreetMap Wiki has a version history of each page
> which shows you who edited the page at which time.
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/Toilet_
> Tagging_Improvements&action=history
> That's why I think that the section "Revision Notes" is also not necessary.
>
> You can add a link to the previous discussions on the mailing lists
> which are the reason for the changes of your proposal. That would be
> great for people in future who want to understand your changes and why
> things are as they are.
>
> Best regards
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> --
> Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten
> ausgenommen)
> I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20170417/74bf821f/attachment.html>